Once again, history is on the way to repeat in American politics. It seems that for two different reasons United States citizens have felt the need for third-party politics. They believe in one or two political issues do not have a large enough in either of the two major parties platforms role or do not believe in anything and was upset with how democracy and debate political issues in society.
The green movement in American politics showed that the first reason for the formation of a political party in the third part really are a useful way to have an impact on policy. The main reason for the American political system has only two games is the setup of the ballot and how political elections are won. As we all know, you need a majority or 51% of the vote to win elections most policy and 51% of the citizens of the State to win the votes of the State electoral college vote.
The system of majority policy faces two candidates against each other and does not give any incentive to win only 15% of the votes. The contrast with the American political system is Great Britain, which has a proportional system. Due to this system policy in Great Britain is different in its core of American politics. In a proportional political system, if you have 10 seats and a political party wins 20% of the votes, then, earn 2 10 seats. I am sure you can imagine how this will affect the strategy of politics and art in this system.
Good to drive what is and what do have to do with that?
Unity08 surface is trying to sell himself as the Party of the people and uses surveys and catchy marketing to try to convince people to join your cause. They are a wannabe has no third party will have core that is not covered by the two major parties. Actually claim that they take the most crucial issues instead of questions of something important that actually does not affect people.
Show base for supporting citing one of polls that show the American public agree with some things that are totally unrelated to a third party in the policy. Things like dissatisfaction with the way the country is in charge and polarizaton. Also surveyed about different hypothetical a unity ticket questions and probably wondered whether is agreed or disagreed with the idea. The good political pollsters know that people are always more likely to reach agreement on any issue when given the choice.
OK so now have to do with the policy of third parties? Well technically, they claim they don't want to be part of a third party. No not.... they want to influence the major political parties 2, giving them an alarm clock. Oh gets much better than this. Appear to contradict themselves much. Unwilling to leave their political parties, but want a moderate candidate or person of every big political party to bind and run on your ticket.
So on to some of their key political issues of national debt, nuclear proliferation, the attention of health for all, and the disappearance of the American dream only want one candidate from each party to meet and run?
OK OK....? Slow I toward down if I'm wrong about this but their differences about how to go, on these issues, what makes America in the model? Our founding fathers did not set our political system with this shock, and the debate?
I feel that I am under the Capitol Dome apparently looking painting of Thomas Jefferson tread finger of John Adams and unity that asks Mr. Jefferson if it could shake you, and then to embrace Mr Adams as his political friend. The policy of the founders the American ideals of Newtonian physics where 2 political parties both top bosses and equal opposite reaction would end up in a balance system.
You cannot expect to have bits and pieces of each different approach given by the major parties, throw them in a blender and out comes the perfect solution. Most of the moderates in politics today argue views on political issues that are in the hands of both political parties. However, because they believe in its core platform are affiliated with a particular political party.
Finally, whether unity08 plans to have a prominent member of each Party on their presidential ticket for the 2008 election, how then decide what party holds the Chair and Vice-Chair of suspensions of which one. I feel that I don't need to say this but unity08 facilitates and don't see the huge difference in power between these two political positions.
So my final thought is this...The founders and supporters of unity08 are in this thing for exactly one of the reasons. * Drumroll * money. Plain and simple. Unity08 said that they are looking for an Advisory Board of the FEC to see if not a political Committee can be considered. This means that you do not want to be subject to the rules of the CHF. Nothing also declares that are a nonprofit and therefore I have to wonder if they are not only a business for profit.
Finally, one of the main founders bio on his Web page says this...
"Hamilton Jordan, Atlanta, Georgia." Chief of staff of White House Carter, the writer, the investor; focused on the creation of enterprises for purposes of profit and non-profit; "most importantly, father of three".
This could mean anything, but surely stands out... investor;... without nonprofit and nonprofit start-ups. Also, most of these former political people would have not lost their time in this if they could not control cut that they will do as unity08 consultants.
Hmmm...This smacks of scam and unrealistic dreams that contradict not only political configuration of founding fathers for America, but are also bad for America. The 2 party system is and will always be the best system for America. Does America need advocates of the politicians and the greater involvement of citizens? Of course! Conflict and honest debate is the best way for the perfect solution.
Therefore finally let me say, unity08, no, thank you.
Here is a link to your site. I feel that is doing a service but for my readers who do not know what I'm talking about, I believe that I have.
Jonathan D. Rhyne
The Right Minded editor elephant http://rightmindedelephant.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment